Visualization: Revenue progressivity


Select a state and year (1993-2019) to display a graph summarizing the progressivity (or “fairness”) of state and local revenue to public K-12 schools. The three bars in the graph represent, for a given state in a given year, the percent difference in adjusted state and local revenue between:

  1. Low (10%) poverty districts and zero poverty districts;
  2. Medium (20%) poverty districts and zero poverty districts;
  3. High (30%) poverty districts and zero poverty districts.

Negative numbers indicate regressive funding (low/ medium/ high poverty districts receive less revenue than zero poverty districts), whereas positive numbers indicate progressive funding (low/ medium/ high poverty districts receive more revenue than zero poverty districts). District poverty is measured with U.S. Census data, and the “predicted” revenue estimates used in these comparisons also control for labor market costs, population density, and district size. Note that progressivity estimates are not available for Hawaii and the District of Columbia, as both contain only one government-run school district. For more information on these measures, see our State Indicators Database user’s guide and our annual report. You can also download the full dataset.



Latest News

NEW RELEASE: SECOND EDITION OF DISTRICT COST DATABASE

February 2022: Evaluate K-12 funding adequacy for 12,000 districts between 2009-19. Download the full dataset or see results for your district with the DCD data visualization tool.

Latest Annual Report

The Adequacy and Fairness of State School Finance Systems (fourth edition)

The fourth edition of our annual report presenting findings on effort, adequacy, and progressivity in state school finance systems. Published December 2021. Read the report.

Latest Research Briefs

RESEARCH BRIEF: One-Page State School Finance Profiles

Profiles presenting the latest data on the K-12 finance systems of all 50 states and D.C. Published December 2021. Download your state’s profile.